Agenda item
Review of North Place & Portland Street Development Brief & Civic Pride Urban Design Framework
Report of the Cabinet Member Built Environment
Minutes:
The Cabinet Member
Built Environment introduced the report. The report explained that
on 27 July 2010 Cabinet had approved a consultation exercise on the proposed revisions
of the North Place and Portland Street Development Brief and its
associated technical appendix; the Cheltenham Civic Pride Urban
Design Framework Supplementary Planning Document (SPD). These
revisions were considered necessary by the Cheltenham Development
Task Force in order to reflect current market conditions and enable
greater flexibility in the type and mix of uses that could be
accommodated on the site.
He stressed that whilst the SPD was far more flexible than before, there would still be high standards set for the quality of the development.
Consultation formally took place between 23rd August and 1st October 2010 and the comments have now been considered and the documents revised accordingly. The key changes are set out under paragraph 4.3 of this report. A full schedule of the comments received and the proposed changes to each document is provided at Appendix A (for the SPD) and Appendix B (for the Development Brief).
This consultation had been key to the development of the brief and a wide range of comments had been received. He was pleased that many of the suggestions had now been incorporated. He thanked the Strategic Land Use Team for their work in carrying out the consultation and drafting responses.
He referred to the proposed amendments to the recommendations which had been circulated at the start of the meeting. The first one related to car parking where he said it was important to maintain a stated minimum of public car parking spaces. The reference to underground car parking as an option had also been reinstated. The second amendment was in response to comments from the Civic Society that Portland Street may not be the best site for the 6-bay bus node as it could impair the vision for this street becoming a green gateway into the town. The amendment gave flexibility to the developers by suggesting that the bus node could be located anywhere in the North Place/Portland Street site and potentially in North Place.
Members of Cabinet supported the Development brief and SPD. They welcomed the flexibility but emphasised that quality must not be compromised and good design was essential if the vision was to be achieved.
RESOLVED THAT:
1.
That the revisions to the
Cheltenham Civic Pride Urban Design Framework Supplementary
Planning Document and the North Place and Portland Street
Development Brief be approved, subject to the additional amendments
set out at (2) and (3) below, and that it be recommended that
Council adopts them as amended
2. That the proposed wording at 3.39(ii) of the Supplementary Planning Document, “About 300 public car parking spaces” is not approved and that the previous wording be reinstated, namely:
“A minimum of
300 public car parking spaces. Developers are likely to be asked to
consider two different options for the public car park: one
underground and the other over-ground.”
with consequent changes being made wherever the number of car park spaces is referred to in the Development Brief.
3. That the proposed wording of the Development Brief in Design Principle D, sub-section e. be amended as follows:
“A 6-bay bus node for local and national services, to include appropriate interchange and support facilities, will be accommodated at the southern end of the North Place/Portland Street site, potentially in North Place.
with a consequent change being made to Design Principle E, sub-section h(i) to delete the words “including the bus node”.
Supporting documents:
- 2010_11_16_CAB_N Place & Portland_St, item 6. PDF 56 KB
- Appendix A, item 6. PDF 81 KB
- Appendix B, item 6. PDF 223 KB
- Appendix C, item 6. PDF 2 MB
- Appendix D, item 6. PDF 23 KB
- Background Doc 1, item 6. PDF 3 MB
- Background Doc 2, item 6. PDF 690 KB
- Background Doc 3, item 6. PDF 841 KB
- Background Doc 4, item 6. PDF 53 KB