Issue - meetings
Art Gallery and Museum - collections disposal policy
Meeting: 27/09/2011 - Cabinet (Item 5)
5 Review of the Art Gallery & Museum's Acquisitions and Disposal Policy PDF 130 KB
Report of the Cabinet Member Sport and Culture
Additional documents:
- Appendix_2_Loan_conditions, item 5 PDF 16 KB
- Appendix_4_Condition Assessment of Clock, item 5 PDF 276 KB
- Appendix_5_Acquisitions_Loan_Policy, item 5 PDF 90 KB
- Appendix_3_Valuation, item 5 PDF 88 KB
Decision:
RESOLVED that:
1. Under section 12f within the proposed Acquisitions & Disposal Policy for Cheltenham ArtGallery & Museum the museum will not undertake disposal motivated principally by financial reasons.
2. The revised Acquisitions & Disposal Policy for Cheltenham ArtGallery & Museum in Appendix 5, incorporating the decision made at 1. above be approved, and that the policy will again be reviewed in 2016.
3. The request for the return of a clock - given to the Art Gallery & Museum in 1963 – be refused.
Minutes:
The Cabinet Member
Sport and Culture introduced the report which asked Cabinet to
consider and make a decision regarding which statements to include
under section 12f within the proposed Acquisitions and Disposal
Policy for Cheltenham Art Gallery and Museum (AG&M), to approve
the revised Acquisitions and Disposal Policy and to consider the
request for a return of a clock given to the AG&M in 1963. The
Cabinet Member Sport and Culture stressed that any decision made on
the Acquisitions and Disposals policy would not impact on any
subsequent decision.
The Cabinet Member
Sport and Culture referred to the Appendix and the copy of the
Acquisitions and Disposal Policy which outlined the terms on which
the Council made acquisitions and disposals to the policy. He
strongly recommended Option 2 to Cabinet as if the Council adopted
a policy of sale for profit it would jeopardise the standing of the
museum as viewed by the Museums, Libraries and Archives Council and
put at risk the funding the Council had in place for improvements
to the AG&M. In his view this risk would not be worth any
financial gain it may make.
Members supported Option 2 and commended the policy as a whole.
With regard to the
specific issue on the request by Mr Stuart Latham for a return of a
clock given to the AG&M in 1963, the Leader referred Members to
the official valuation which had been circulated at the meeting and
used his discretion by inviting Mr Latham to address the
meeting.
Mr Latham told Cabinet
of his early memories of the clock and his disappointment when he
discovered its incompleteness (apparent loss of its wooden case,
pendulum and weights) and condition upon viewing it at the
AG&M. There also appeared to be no record that it had ever been
exhibited. He believed that the Museum had failed his family. He
had thus put in a formal request to have the clock returned to him,
not for financial reasons, but in order to refurbish it and have it
in his home.
Cabinet Members
appreciated the importance of the clock to Mr Latham but noted that
contrary to Mr Latham’s opinion the inspection had found that
the clock was in a good condition. There was no
indication from the acquisition records that there were parts
missing nor evidence of its condition upon donation. It was
suggested that if Cabinet decided the clock should be retained by
the AG&M Mr Latham should be involved in discussions regarding
its restoration if deemed necessary. The clock was obviously of
historical importance and as such the Council would wish members of
the public to have the opportunity to appreciate too.
The Cabinet Member
Sport, Leisure and Culture thanked Mr Latham for his
contribution.
The Collections Manager and Curator at the AG&M referred to the prime record relating to the acquisition of the clock in 1963 and said that no reference had been made to the pendulum, weights or ... view the full minutes text for item 5