Issue - meetings
Interim Review of Polling Districts, Places and Stations
Meeting: 16/10/2023 - Council (Item 9)
9 Interim Review of Polling Districts, Places and Stations PDF 516 KB
Report of the Electoral Registration Officer
Additional documents:
- 2023_10_16_COU_Interim_Review_of_PD_PP__PS_Appendix_2, item 9 PDF 494 KB
- 2023_10_16_COU_Interim_Review_of_PD_PP__PS_Appendix_3, item 9 PDF 665 KB
- 2023_10_16_COU_Interim_Review_of_PD_PP__PS_Appendix_4, item 9 PDF 157 KB
- 2023_10_16_Interim_Review_of_PD_PP__PS_Appendix_5, item 9 PDF 111 KB
- All Saints AA, item 9 PDF 10 MB
- All Saints AB, item 9 PDF 10 MB
- All Saints AC, item 9 PDF 10 MB
- Battledown BA, item 9 PDF 10 MB
- Battledown BB, item 9 PDF 11 MB
- Battledown BC, item 9 PDF 10 MB
- Benhall The Reddings & Fiddlers Green CA, item 9 PDF 10 MB
- Benhall The Reddings & Fiddlers Green CB, item 9 PDF 10 MB
- Benhall The Reddings & Fiddlers Green CC, item 9 PDF 10 MB
- Benhall The Reddings & Fiddlers Green CD, item 9 PDF 10 MB
- Charlton Kings DA, item 9 PDF 10 MB
- Charlton Park EA, item 9 PDF 11 MB
- Charlton Park EB, item 9 PDF 11 MB
- Charlton Park EC, item 9 PDF 11 MB
- Charlton Park ED, item 9 PDF 11 MB
- Charlton Park EE, item 9 PDF 11 MB
- College FA, item 9 PDF 12 MB
- College FB, item 9 PDF 12 MB
- College FC, item 9 PDF 12 MB
- College FD, item 9 PDF 12 MB
- College FE, item 9 PDF 12 MB
- Hesters Way GA, item 9 PDF 9 MB
- Hesters Way GB, item 9 PDF 9 MB
- Hesters Way GC, item 9 PDF 9 MB
- Lansdown HA, item 9 PDF 11 MB
- Lansdown HB, item 9 PDF 11 MB
- Lansdown HC, item 9 PDF 11 MB
- Lansdown HD, item 9 PDF 11 MB
- Leckhampton IA, item 9 PDF 9 MB
- Leckhampton IB, item 9 PDF 9 MB
- Leckhampton IC, item 9 PDF 9 MB
- Oakley JA, item 9 PDF 8 MB
- Oakley JB, item 9 PDF 8 MB
- Oakley JC, item 9 PDF 8 MB
- Park KA, item 9 PDF 10 MB
- Park KB, item 9 PDF 10 MB
- Park KC, item 9 PDF 10 MB
- Pittville LA, item 9 PDF 10 MB
- Pittville LB, item 9 PDF 10 MB
- Pittville LC, item 9 PDF 10 MB
- Pittville LD, item 9 PDF 10 MB
- Prestbury MA, item 9 PDF 8 MB
- Prestbury MB, item 9 PDF 8 MB
- Prestbury MC, item 9 PDF 8 MB
- Springbank NA, item 9 PDF 8 MB
- Springbank NB, item 9 PDF 8 MB
- Springbank NC, item 9 PDF 9 MB
- St Marks OA, item 9 PDF 10 MB
- St Marks OB, item 9 PDF 10 MB
- St Pauls PA, item 9 PDF 10 MB
- St Pauls PB, item 9 PDF 10 MB
- St Peters QA, item 9 PDF 11 MB
- St Peters QB, item 9 PDF 11 MB
- Swindon Village RA, item 9 PDF 8 MB
- Swindon Village RB, item 9 PDF 8 MB
- Swindon Village RC, item 9 PDF 8 MB
- Up Hatherley SA, item 9 PDF 9 MB
- Up Hatherley SB, item 9 PDF 9 MB
- Up Hatherley SC, item 9 PDF 9 MB
- Up Hatherley SD, item 9 PDF 9 MB
- Up Hatherley SE, item 9 PDF 9 MB
- Warden Hill TA, item 9 PDF 10 MB
- Warden Hill TB, item 9 PDF 10 MB
- Warden Hill TC, item 9 PDF 10 MB
- Warden Hill TD, item 9 PDF 10 MB
Minutes:
The Executive Director for Finance, Assets and Regeneration introduced the report, saying that the Local Government Boundary Commission for England completed its review, with the order made on 18 July 2023, and changes coming into effect on 02 May 2024. The council has a statutory duty to review its polling districts, places and stations, and make sure that these are accessible to all. The consultation exercise is now complete and the recommendations ready to be put forward. He thanked everyone who shared their views, and Kim Smith and the elections team in particular for finding an alternative polling station for Battledown ward, following local concern about the closure of Holy Apostles school for the by-election earlier this year.
In response to Member questions, the Executive Director for Finance, Assets and Regeneration and the Electoral Services Manager confirmed that:
- although at present, the polling station for a county council by-election in Park and Lansdown wards would be a portakabin at the Town Hall or Salem Baptist Church rather than the usual polling stations, it is hoped that with the county boundary changes next year, these anomalies will be matched up so that people don’t go to different polling stations for borough and county elections;
- although some voters may find the new polling station in Battledown more difficult to get to, the council cannot consider helping people get there. Cheltenham is unique in the number of polling stations and their proximity to voters, particularly compared with rural areas where people sometimes have to travel substantially further. The council always looks for polling stations that are as amenable as possible for voters. In Battledown, the proposed portakabin at the cricket club has good parking, and the cricket club is looking to make itself more accessible, with the clubhouse itself used as the polling station in future.
Member debate
In debate, Members made the following observations:
- with a few polling stations some way outside the ward, people may have trouble recognising the area where they live in relation to the ward where they live, which seems bizarre;
- will the Leader consider keeping the boundary working group– some wards need to be revisited, such as Benhall, which is split by a dual carriageway. Ward boundary changes should come from the local authority – we shouldn’t have to wait for the boundary commission who don’t know the area to make piecemeal changes that are number-based rather than community-based. As an example, in May, a small part of Hesters Way ward will end up in Tewkesbury constituency, which seems ludicrous. The boundary working group could draw up something for the future that is more representative of communities and works well;
- thanks to the team who delivered this work – it has involved a huge amount of hard work.
The Leader said most people would continue to vote in the same place as previously. Although CBC could ask the question, she doubted whether the Boundary Commission would consider re-looking at Cheltenham for at ... view the full minutes text for item 9