Decision details

Request for the inclusion of buildings on the Council's register of assets of community value

Decision status: Recommendations Approved

Is Key decision?: No

Is subject to call in?: No

Decision:

I have made an assessment of a nomination from Fairview Community Association against the criteria set out in s.88 of the Localism Act to have The Maple Leaf in the borough designated as “Asset of Community Value”.

 

This nomination meets the criteria to be an asset of community value and will be placed on Cheltenham Borough Council’s list of successful nominations.

Reasons for the decision:

The council has recently received a nomination from Fairview Community Association to have a local pub in the borough designated as “Asset of Community Value”

 

The nominations was as follows:

 

·         The Maple Leaf

 

Buildings

Owner

Recommendation

The Maple Leaf

Mr. Paul Haskins

There is good evidence that the Maple Leaf furthers (or in the recent past has furthered) the social wellbeing and social interests of the local community, that this is the main and non-ancillary use of the premises. The comments from both the owner and the owner’s legal representative have been noted, but there still remains the possibility that the qualifying use could be achieved within the next five years. This nomination therefore meets the criteria to be an asset of community value and will be placed on Cheltenham Borough Council’s list of successful nominations

 

Other reasons / organisations consulted

I met with the Strategy and Engagement Manager, The Director of Planning and a Solicitor from One Legal to review the ten nominations. The nominations were assessed against the following set of criteria:

A.   Is the nominating organisation eligible?

B.   Can the nominating organisation demonstrate a local connection to the asset?

C.   Does the nomination include the information requested on the nomination form?

D.   If the asset is outside one of the categories of exempt assets, as set out in schedule 1 of the regulations?

E.   Is there evidence of the use being described in the nomination, and that this is the main and non-ancillary use of the land or premises, or this has been its use within the last 5 years?

F.    Does this use further the social wellbeing and social interests of the local community?

G.   Could the asset realistically continue to be used for this, or another qualifying community purpose (or could this be achieved within the next five years)?

 

 

The Strategy and Engagement Manager, The Director of Planning and a Solicitor from One Legal supported me in this decision.

 

Contact: Pat Pratley, Chief Executive Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected].

Publication date: 23/03/2016

Date of decision: 23/03/2016

Accompanying Documents: